What a measurement can't tell you

This app exists to replace folklore with measurement — which makes it doubly important to say where measurement stops. Every chart in PedalScope is honest; none of them is complete. Here is what the numbers do not, and sometimes cannot, capture.

The measurements are snapshots

A Fingerprint is one set of knob positions, one moment — and most of its sub-measurements probe one drive level at a time. The app widens the frame where it can — the Gain Map makes level an axis, family runs make a knob an axis — but a pedal is a surface with more dimensions than any finite set of sweeps. The charts interpolate; your playing extrapolates.

Time-variance mostly escapes the net

The measurement model assumes the pedal behaves the same during second five of a sweep as during second one. Many interesting circuits don’t, quite:

When a summary hedges (“appears to”, “at this measurement’s level”), this is the family of reasons why.

The rig is part of the instrument

PedalScope measures the pedal against the interface’s line input — a clean, high-headroom, mostly-resistive load. Your rig is messier in ways that matter:

The band edge is faded, not measured

Reading harmonic k at note f₀ means reading output frequency k·f₀ — and for high harmonics of high notes that runs off the edge of what the measurement chain can honestly report. Where it does, the app fades the trace instead of pretending: faded, dashed regions on the Harmonic Distortion and Compare charts (and faded columns on a single-harmonic Gain Map map) are analysis artifacts past the reliable edge, shown so you can see where the limit is, excluded from every fit, summary, and quoted number. The bound is computed from each record’s own sweep and calibration parameters, not assumed.

Separately from that limit, every quoted THD/IMD percentage integrates the audible band, 20 Hz–20 kHz — a pedal’s real ultrasonic content is measured (and feeds the Hear-it models), but content no rig reproduces doesn’t move the numbers. That keeps the same pedal quoting the same figures whatever the capture rate.

THD is a number, not a verdict

Total harmonic distortion says how much was added — nothing about how it reads. Two pedals at an identical 10 % THD can sound worlds apart: one concentrated in a warm H2, the other spread across a fizzy high series. That’s why the app leads with the full Harmonic Distortion measurement and treats THD as one summary row of it. Distrust any comparison anywhere that reduces distortion character to a single percentage.

Black box means black box

The app measures behavior at the jacks. It cannot see components, topology, or clipping-element chemistry — and its summaries are explicitly forbidden from claiming them. If a description here ever seems to know what’s on the circuit board, that’s a bug in our honesty, and we’d like to hear about it.

And feel is still yours

Latency of your own muscles against the attack, the way a note blooms at stage volume, whether the thing makes you play differently — the parts of “feel” that live in the loop between your hands and your ears aren’t in any chart. The measurements are a map of the pedal. You are still the territory’s judge.